We found that while 43.6% of Alaska is managed for high and medium levels of conservation, a disproportionate amount (41.3 %) of those lands occur at high elevations (above 510 m), which are typically less biologically diverse than low-lying areas. Across the state, 5 of 19 vegetation classes are insufficiently represented in the existing protected areas. When examining vegetation classes within ecoregions, 16 of 19 are found to be insufficiently represented in at least one of the ecoregions in which they occur. We also assessed the potential contribution of Native-owned lands, which encompass the majority of private lands, to conservation of terrestrial biodiversity. If we assume that the largely undeveloped lands owned by Native entities are being managed for conservation, the representation of terrestrial ecosystems improves. |
We conclude that the conservation of Alaska’s biodiversity is not as sufficient as looking at land management and ownership alone would indicate. Some vegetation classes, especially those at low elevations, require additional protection to ensure broad and widespread conservation across environmental gradients and to guard against changes in biodiversity related to climate change. Conservation management of Native-owned lands may provide some of the solution to adequately protect terrestrial ecosystems in Alaska. Download report: Assessing Protection of Alaska’s Terrestrial Biodiversity.pdf (376 KB) |
![]() |




